THE TRANSMOUNTAIN PIPELINE, ENGLISH FRENCH TRANSLATION.

ENGLISH                                                                                                           FRENCH TRANSLATION

                                                                                                               

I know that at present 99% of      

Canadian Crude goes to the

The United States. I also know that

we PAY them a 25% discount to take it.                                Je suis                                                         

I also know that we pay a 25% PREMIUM,

In order to buy the finished (refined)

 product back.                                                                        Je suis stupide

I understand that as a taxpaying Canadian

Citizen, I just spent $4.5 B on a pipeline that

All CANADIANS taxpaying or otherwise, other

than GOVERNMENT and the POLITICAL MACHINES

WILL OWN, the sole purpose of which

is to further

Facilitate the above two items.                                                  Je suis stupide

And I’ll also be helping,

along with other Canadian Citizens,

to fund the additional $ 5.78 required

to finish it so that the GOVERNMENT,

politicians, UNITED STATES BASED

OIL CORPORATIONS, and Parkland can

Continue to rob ALL Canadians blind.                                    Je suis stupide

Then as a taxpaying resident of B.C.

I’m paying a legal team to STOP construction

Of the pipeline I just most foolishly bought.                   Je suis stupide

               

I STILL BELIEVE IN THIS TYPE OF CAPITALIST.

CORPORATE, FASCIST SHEEP DIP; FURTHER,

I ACTUALLY ACCEPT THAT GOVERNMENT **OF**

THE PEOPLE IS A ^^^NECESSARY EVIL^^^ OF

MODERN ECONOMICS.                                                           Je suis stupide

 I am stupid                                                                                            Je suis stupide                                                                                                          

Wake up Alberta, British Columbia; Face Reality, why do you Think the Cruise Ships are Coming to Vancouver?

 Hint: it is not to see a Kinder Morgan Crude Petroleum Shipping Terminal

http://vancouversun.com/news/local-news/by-the-numbers-vancouver-gears-up-for-2018-season-of-cruise-ship-crowds

Canada oil sands Asia export dream faces port bottleneck - Reuters

https://www.reuters.com/.../us...ports.../canada-oil-sands-asia-export-dream-faces-port-...

Nov 20, 2016 - Vancouver is the only west coast port where it can be sold on to Asia. “If Canada can't get their oil to another market besides the U.S. (market), you'll always be a price taker, not a price maker,” said Sandy Fielden, director of ... In October, a vessel carrying around 150,000 barrels of crude left to South Korea.

https://www.fraserinstitute.org/blogs/hold-on-tight-canada-s-crude-oil-discount-is-likely-to-get-worse

THE ULTIMATE EVOLUTION OF CAPITALISM INTO COMMUNIST SOCIALISM

In the terminology of Marx and Engels, the words communism and socialism are synonymous. They are alternately applied without any distinction between them. The same was true for the practice of all Marxian groups and sects until 1917. The political parties of Marxism which considered the Communist Manifesto as the unalterable gospel of their doctrine called themselves socialist parties. The most influential and most numerous of these parties, the German party, adopted the name Social Democratic Party. In Italy, in France and in all other countries in which Marxian parties already played a role in political life before 1917, the term socialist likewise superseded the term communist. No Marxian ever ventured, before 1917, to distinguish between communism and socialism.

In 1875, in his Criticism of the Gotha Programme of the German Social Democratic Party, Marx distinguished between a lower (earlier) and a higher (later) phase of the future communist society. But he did not reserve the name of communism to the higher phase and did not call the lower phase socialism as differentiated from communism.

Marx did NOT believe in the Political Party System Machine; so of course, he could not be a Bolshevik and also of course, unlike Lenin he was not a Fascist.

In order to understand the mentality of Lenin’s FASCIST Bolshevists, we must again refer to the dogmas of Karl Marx. Marx was fully convinced that capitalism is a stage of economic history which is not limited to a few advanced countries only. Capitalism has the tendency to convert all parts of the world into capitalist countries. The bourgeoisie forces all nations to become capitalist nations. When the final hour of capitalism sounds, the whole world will be uniformly in the stage of mature capitalism, ripe for the transition to socialism. Socialism will emerge at the same time in all parts of the world.

Marx erred on this point. Today even the Marxian’s cannot and do not deny that there still prevail enormous differences in the development of capitalism in various countries. They realise that there are many countries which, from the point of view of the Marxian interpretation of history, must be described as precapitalistic. In these countries, the bourgeoisie (Capitalist Fascist Elite) has not yet attained a Total Global IMPERIAL Dictatorship position and has not yet set the historical stage of capitalism which is the necessary prerequisite of the appearance of socialism. These countries, therefore, must first accomplish their “bourgeois revolution” and must go through all phases of capitalism before there can be any question of transforming them into socialist countries. But, there remains hope; perhaps one day the working PEOPLE IN THIS COUNTRY OF OURS will at least be able to truly say THEY at least OWN THE GROUND IN WHICH THEY ARE BURIED.              Al (Alex-Alexander) D Girvan.

United States Exceptionalism, White supremacy or White Supremacism (Superman Comics) is a racist ideology based upon the belief that white people are superior in many ways to people of other races and that therefore white people should be dominant over other races.

United States (Exceptionalism) White Supremacy Has Roots In Scientific United States White Supremacists Typically Oppose Members Of Other Races And Or Religions As Well As Jews.

The term is also typically used to describe a political ideology that perpetuates and maintains the social, political, historical or institutional domination by white people (as evidenced by historical and contemporary socio-political structures such as gender inequities, Atlantic slave trade, Jim Crow laws in the United States, and apartheid in South Africa. Different forms of white supremacism put forth different conceptions of who is considered white, and different forms of white supremacists identify various religious, racial and cultural groups as their primary enemy.

In academic usage, particularly in usage which draws on the critical race theory, the term "white supremacy" can also refer to a political or socio-economic system where white people enjoy a structural advantage (privilege) over other ethnic groups, both as a collective and an individual level.

The master race (German: die Herrenrasse)) is a concept in United States Exceptionalist, Nazi and Neo-Nazi ideology in which the Nordic or Aryan races, predominant among Germans and other northern European peoples, are deemed the highest in the racial hierarchy.

The Nazi official Alfred Rosenberg believed that the Nordic race was descended from Proto-Aryans who he believed had prehistorically dwelt on the North German Plain and who had ultimately originated from the lost continent of Atlantis. The Nazis declared that the Nordics (now referred to as the Germanic peoples), or Aryan as they sometimes called them, were superior to all other races. The Nazis like United States Exceptionalist-White supremacy or white supremacism is a racist ideology based upon the belief that white people are superior in many ways to people of other races and that therefore white people should be dominant over other races. White supremacy has roots in scientific racism and it often relies on pseudoscientific arguments. Like most similar movements such as neo-Nazism, white supremacists typically oppose members of other races as well as Jews.

The Term Is Also Typically Used To Describe A Political Ideology That Perpetuates And Maintains The Social, Political, Historical Or Institutional Domination By White People (As Evidenced By Historical And Contemporary Sociopolitical Structures Such As Gender Inequities, Atlantic Slave Trade, Jim Crow Laws In The United States, And Apartheid In South Africa). Different forms of white supremacism put forth different conceptions of who is considered white, and different forms of white supremacists identify various racial and cultural groups as their primary enemy.

In academic usage, particularly in usage which draws on the critical race theory, the term "white supremacy" can also refer to a political or socio-economic system where white people enjoy a structural advantage (privilege) over other ethnic groups, both as a collective and an individual level. The United States Exceptionalisms believers believed they were entitled to expand territorially.

 This same basic concept is also known as Nordicism. The actual policy that was implemented by the Nazis resulted in the Aryan certificate, the one form of the official document that was required by the law for all citizens of the Reich was the "Lesser Aryan certificate" (Kleiner Ariernachweis) which could be obtained through an Ahnenpass which required the owner to trace his or her lineage through baptism, birth certificates or certified proof thereof that all grandparents were of "Aryan descent". Al (Alex-Alexander)D Girvan.

By the People, Of the People, For the People= Taxpaying Canadian Families; not Blood Sucking Capitalist Fascist CORPORATIONS

Can You, Do You, WILL You Believe; It's time for Canada/Canadians to bring back the Canada my Great Great Grand Parents, Grandparents, Uncles Fathe Mother fought for?  It's also time to Boot a few Road Apples  Bison Chips, Eradicate a Few Utterly Useless Bloodsuckers(I'm not taking Mosquitos or even Bed Bugs)-before it's too late to even survive?? 

The Effects of the “True” American Dream; Which is, of Course, Total Global Dictatorship, Global Fascism=American Exceptionalism/White Supremacy

American exceptionalism is also the concept that America (wherever in HELL that is) has a purpose on this OUR earth that is set apart from other nations. This concept has been around since the mid-1800’s and is the accepted norm of today’s Canadian and United States society. The danger lies in the fact that through the guise of exceptionalism we have masked the true Dictatorial Identities of Fanatical Fascist imperialism, supremacy, and racism.

The people who ascribe to this ideology have tricked themselves into believing that they hold no racial bias. They do not believe that they are superior to another based on their race but rather based on their country of origin. This logic is somehow more acceptable. If one were to change the words “American Exceptionalism” to “American Supremacy” would the same concept still hold true? Would people still be fooled into believing that they are not biased against another race?

The reason that this is so important is that this concept can lead us into a state of apathy towards injustices committed by our own government. The United States kills civilians and non-combatants every day in Afghanistan and around the world. American exceptionalism has allowed people who care genuinely about protecting life the option to not care about these lives because they do not live on the same land mass that they do. Recently the U.S. attacked a town on the border of Afghanistan. This air strike killed 11 children and is alleged to have killed two Taliban operatives.

Let us Not Forget the twit-HITLER Trump-ettes Mother Fxxxer of all BOOMS.

Due to American exceptionalism, the citizenry of the U.S. has been led to believe that this is a fair trade. They have been led to believe that innocent children are just collateral damage. In many ways,. It is an idea that whitewashes the minds of millions of people into believing that we must protect the lives of our children by killing other children.

the modern American citizen has been told that these children do not exist. Many people do not want to hear about this **News** or to delve into the details of the most recent wars that shows this sort of operation happens far too often.

Al (Alex-Alexander)D. Girvan.

Definitions and Examples-Democracy, Republic, Marx Socialist/Communism

Miriam Webster’s AMERICAN definition of Republic

(1) a government having a chief of state who is not a monarch and who in modern times is usually a president

(2) a political unit (such as a nation) having such a form of government

(3) a government in which supreme power resides in a body of citizens entitled to vote and is exercised by elected officers and representatives responsible to them and governing according to law

(4)a political unit (such as a nation) having such a form of government

(5) a usually specified republican government of a political unit the French Fourth Republic

Definition of Republic in English: Oxford: NOUN

1A state in which supreme power is held by the people and their elected representatives, and which has an elected or nominated president rather than a monarch.

1.1archaic A group with a certain equality between its members.

Origin: Late 16th century: from French république, from Latin respublica, from res ‘entity, concern’ + publicus ‘of the people, public’.

The key difference between a democracy and a republic lies in the limits placed on government by the law, which has implications for minority rights. Both forms of government tend to use a representational system — i.e., citizens vote to elect politicians to represent their interests and form the government. In a republic, a constitution or charter of rights protects certain inalienable rights that cannot be taken away by the government, even if it has been elected by a majority of voters. In a "pure democracy," the majority is not restrained in this way and can impose its will on the minority.

Most modern nations are democratic republics with a constitution, which can be amended by a popularly elected government. This comparison, therefore, contrasts the form of government in most countries today with a theoretical construct of a "pure democracy", mainly to highlight the Differences as well as the Similarities

Comparison Chart

Differences — Similarities —

Democracy versus Republic comparison chart
	Democracy	Republic
Definition	Rule by the omnipotent majority. In a democracy, an individual, and any group of individuals composing any minority, have no protection against the unlimited power of the majority. It is a case of Majority-over-Man.	A republic is similar to a representative democracy except it has a written constitution of basic rights that protect the minority from being completely unrepresented or overridden by the majority.
Social Structure	Class distinctions can become pronounced due to capitalist society. Varies from state to state.	Class distinctions can become pronounced due to capitalist society. Varies from state to state.
Constraints on the government	No; the majority can impose its will on the minority.	Yes; the majority cannot take away certain inalienable rights.
Religion	Generally, freedom of religion is permitted, although a majority faction may limit religious freedom for a minority faction.	Generally, freedom of religion is permitted, especially insofar as there is a constitutional prohibition on interfering with freedom of religion.
Political System	Democratic. [Note: this is not meant as a reference to a Democratic Party.]	Republican. [Note: this is not meant as a reference to a Republican Party.]
Philosophy	All eligible citizens get an equal say in decisions.	All eligible citizens get an equal say in decisions with the protection of unalienable rights to individuals.
Economic System	Elected by the voters or their elected representatives.	Elected by the voters or their elected representatives.
Famous Examples	Classical Greece, Rome	Rome, France, United States Of America
Sovereignty is held by	the whole population (as a group)	the people (individuals)
Key Elements	Free elections.	Free elections, constitution.
A common confusion in the USA	People commonly confuse direct democracy with representative democracy. The US officially has a representative style, though many have suggested the US is closer to an oligarchy or plutocracy.	The US is actually a Republic. It is governed by rule of law. The elected are bound by oath to the written governing limits (ie constitution) yet vote "together" and create laws to address concerns of the represented in a democratic way
Discrimination	In theory, all citizens have an equal say and so are treated equally. However, often allows for the tyranny of the majority over the minority.	In theory, all citizens have an equal say and so are treated equally by the government, especially insofar as there is a constitutional prohibition on government discrimination.
Modern Examples	More than half of the world, including the US, Canada, Western Europe, Australia, New Zealand, Japan, etc.	The United States of America is a republic.
Free Choice	Individuals may make decisions for themselves except insofar as a majority faction has limited individuals.	Individuals may make decisions for themselves, especially insofar as there is a constitutional prohibition on interfering with freedom of choice.
Private Property	Generally, private property is permitted, although a majority faction may place limits on property rights.	Generally, private property is permitted, especially insofar as there is a constitutional prohibition on interfering with property rights.
Variations	Direct democracy, parliamentary democracy, representative democracy, presidential democracy.	Democratic republics, Constitutional republics.
Way of Change	Voting.	Voting.
Observation in practice	People commonly confuse direct democracy with representative democracy. The US has a representative style. But the will of the people shouldn’t easily decide to change the rules that limit power to the government.	The U.S.A.'s Constitution clearly shows the U.S. as a Republic, Article 4, Section 4 of the U.S. Constitution

Today, citizens Of The United States, for example, often Assume have a REPUBLIC, but what, exactly, does a republic, and the philosophy that defines it—republicanism—mean?

Definition of Republicanism

In general, republicanism refers to the ideology embraced by members of a republic, which is a form of representational government in which leaders are elected for a specific period by the preponderance of the citizenry, the PEOPLE and laws are passed by the same PEOPLE for the benefit of the entire republic, rather than select members of a ruling class, or aristocracy.

In an ideal SOCIAL COMMUNITY MINDED REPUBLIC, leaders are elected From Among The Working Citizenry, Serve The Republic For A Defined Period, Then Return To Their Work, Never To Serve Again. Unlike a direct or "pure" Capitalist Fascist democracy, in which the majority vote rules, a republic guarantees a certain set of basic civil rights to every citizen, codified in a charter or constitution, which cannot be overridden by majority rule.

Key Concepts

Republicanism stresses several key concepts, notably, the importance of civic virtue, the benefits of universal political participation, the dangers of corruption, the need for separate powers within government, and a healthy reverence for the rule of law.

From These Concepts, One Paramount Value Stands Apart: Political Liberty.

Political liberty, in this case, refers not only to freedom from government interference in private affairs but FREEDOM FROM A POLITICAL PARTY OR “HEAD OF STATE”.

It also places great emphasis on self-DISCIPLINE and self- RELIANCE-GET OFF OF YOUR ASS build YOUR Community, Country, Family, Heritage Nation, Realm, Social Society.

Marxist Communism/Socialism Definition, Features, If Ever Practiced=Read Features/Practice of Republicanism They are Exactly the Same. 

Al (Alex-Alexander) D Girvan.